The learning technology
I try to get my organic chemistry students to think in three dimensions on a molecular level, and I try to introduce as much real world practice into the classroom as I can. To do that, I've pulled together a variety of visualization software tools, plus crucial access to databases on the Internet.
Chime Pro®: Developed by Chime Pro® is a chemical structure visualization application that runs in Netscape Communicator® or MS Internet Explorer®. Users can render chemical structures and then visualize them in animated Java applications and applets, besides rendering the structures as Web pages. Chime displays dynamic chemistry models electronically, rather than static pictures of molecules. A plug-in for the software allows users to search for particular chemical structures across a variety of chemical databases. Find out more by visiting MDL.
RasMol: RasMol® is a free application that displays the structure of molecules, showing DNA, proteins, and smaller molecule structures. It can also be used as a research tool. The software provides full-colored, three-dimensional images. A related software, Protein Explorer, allows you to rotate a protein or DNA molecule to show the 3D structure. You can download RasMol for free.
ISIS/Draw®: Described as a "chemically intelligent" drawing package, ISIS/Draw (download ISIS/Draw® for personal or academic use free) allows you to draw structures just as you would a paper sketch and insert the sketch into various documents and programs. Find out more by visiting MDL.
I provide students with access to databases of chemical structures, Chemfinder®, and MSDS (material safety data sheet) web sites (one website, has a nice list of free MSDS web sites). DVC now has 150 computer stations available on campus, with all the needed software; all are Internet accessible. We substitute the wet lab with computer exercises and generally take the whole class into the computer room for lab. I use various CDs with visualizations in lecture.
I also put up a FileMaker Pro® Web-accessible database, and I have a Web board that goes with it. We recruited faculty to participate from three other colleges; the first round of recruiting brought in 10 percent of full-time faculty. I thought that was pretty good, but it's now been 14 months and it hasn't grown, which is troubling.
Here are some additional links to try:
The project support
With no support from my institution, I focused on materials that were freely available on the Web. I did get some funds from Modular CHEM Consortium and critical server support from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
The results
In my enthusiasm, I assumed that students would welcome this approach wholeheartedly. But I got a mixed response when I first started surveying the students, which was very discouraging, considering the amount of personal investment that I made. Some students have been obstinate; they want the traditional approach and don't want to participate. One student, who had come back to complete a prerequisite before entering a doctoral program in nutrition, absolutely hated the way I taught. But I wouldn't budge and told her that she could still be a linear learner, but she'd have to guide herself through the process and evaluate what was important. She now leads a group of graduate students in tutorials on how to approach things from a more constructive basis. And she spoke at a conference about how she discovered metacognitively the way she learns and how she could learn better. So there are converts, although I still get a mixed response from students. But, as I mentioned earlier, I know that I'm helping them learn better and prepare for their future careers.
If you have any questions, you can contact me at:
rrusay@socrates.berkeley.edu
Sort by: Discipline ||
Institution Type ||
Type of Use ||
Author