CL1 - Resources: SMET meta-analysis abstract








Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates
in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology:
A Meta-Analysis - by Leonard Springer, Mary Elizabeth Stanne, and Samuel Donovan

Abstract

Recent calls for instructional innovation in undergraduate science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) courses and programs highlight the need for a solid foundation of education research at the undergraduate level on which to base policy and practice. We report herein the results of a meta-analysis that integrates research on undergraduate SMET education since 1980. The meta-analysis demonstrates that various forms of small-group learning are effective in promoting greater academic achievement, more favorable attitudes toward learning, and increased persistence through SMET courses and programs. The magnitude of the effects reported in this study exceeds most findings in comparable reviews of research on educational innovations and supports more widespread implementation of small-group learning in undergraduate SMET courses.

For more detailed information on the results of the meta-analysis, click here.

More about the authors


Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., and Donovan, S. (1998). "Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis." (Research Monograph No. 11). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education, Review of Educational Research, in press.



Stories
Doing CL
Resources
More Info
FAQs