|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
According to Wilson (1995), a learning environment is a place where learners may work together and support each other as they use a variety of tools and information resources in their pursuit of learning goals and problem-solving activities. This definition of learning environment is informed by constructivist theories of learning. Seymour and Hewitt (1997) point out that
At the time of our interviews (February, 2000), the School of Life Sciences was in the process of reorganizing into two separate schools: the School of Molecular and Cellular Biology and the School of Integrative Biology. The split became official in July, 2000. For the purpose of clarity and to reflect reality at the time of our interviews, we will refer to the unified School of Life Sciences (SOLS). Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2000-2001 Campus Profile. Enrollment information is available online. Professor Lazarowitz left UIUC in 1998 and is currently Professor of Plant Pathology at Cornell University. Deborah Hughes-Hallet (1998) notes that typically "courses taken in other departments have to be approved by the major field, but the content is seldom closely supervised by the major field." A report by the National Research Council (1986) characterized calculus education as "out of date in content, unimaginative, poorly organized for students with different interests, and not reflecting recent advances in the understanding of teaching and learning" (cited in Alexander, Burda, & Millar, 1997). At the core of the problem is a lack of communication and cooperation between the departments that use math in applied situations, like life sciences, and the math departments that often teach a more "pure" form of mathematics. As Deborah Hughes-Hallett (1998) has pointed out, this apparent disjunction has a deleterious effect on the way non-math majors perceive the function and usefulness of math to their particular fields: "From the point of view of the students, they will not see their subjects as interrelated unless the faculty does and unless the faculty takes the trouble to present them that way." This assessment was completed shortly before the publication of this case study. In keeping with the accuracy of the information presented to us during the time of our interviews (February, 2000), we have opted not to present the results in the main body of the case study. Instead, we summarize the results of the BioCalc assessment in an appendix, Discussion 2. More information on the Indicators project is available.
|
Search || Who We Are || Site Map || Meet the CL-1 Team || WebMaster || Copyright || Download
College Level One (CL-1) Home || Collaborative Learning || FLAG || Learning Through Technology || NISE