Banathy, B. H. (1991). Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change (Vol. 3). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

Blank, R. K., & Gruebel, D. (1995). State indicators of science and mathematics education 1995: State-by-state trends and new indictors from the 1993-94 school year. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Clune, W. H., Haimo, D. T., Roitman, J., Romberg, T., Wright, J. C., & Wright, C. S. (1997). Commentaries of mathematics and science standards (Occasional Paper No. 3). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Clune, W. H., & Webb, N. L. (1997). An introduction to the papers and think piece themes. In W. H. Clune, S. B. Millar, S. A. Raizen, N. L. Webb, D. C. Bowcock, E. D. Britton, R. L. Gunter, & R. Mesquita, Research on systemic reform: What have we learned? What do we need to know? (Workshop Report No. 4, Vol. 1, pp. 6-12). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998, January). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California (CPRE Policy Briefs, RB-23). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Crandall, D., et al. (1982). A study of dissemination efforts supporting school improvement (Vols. 3-4). Andover, MA: The NETWORK.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998, January-February). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5-16.

Derry, S., Gance, S., Gance, L. L., & Schlager, M. (forthcoming). Studies in knowledge building practices in technology-mediated work group interactions. To appear in S. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers and cognitive tools II.

Derry, S. J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (in progress). The problems and promises of interdisciplinary scholarship: Perspectives from cognitive science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

DuRussel, L. (in progress). Analogical reasoning in an interdisciplinary working group. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

DuRussel, L., & Derry, S. J. (in progress). Mental models in an interdisciplinary team. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Gance, L. L. (1998). Understanding interdisciplinary teamwork: Challenges for research and practice: The report of a conference organized by the Cognitive Studies of Interdisciplinary Collaboration Project, Madison, WI, 15-16 November 1996 (Workshop Report No. 5). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.

Halpern, D. F. (1996). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (3rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hewson, P., & Nagel, L. (1998, March). An evaluation of TAPPED IN. Arlington, VA: Unpublished report submitted to SRI International.

Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.

Hutchinson, J., & Huberman, M. (1993). Knowledge dissemination and use in science and mathematics education:A literature review (NSF 93-75). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

Kahle, J. B. (1998). Reaching equity in systemic reform: How do we assess progress and problems (Research Monograph No. 9). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Kahle, J. B., & Burger, C. J. (Eds.). (1998). Equity, assessment, and systemic reform [Special issue]. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, (2-3).

Koerner, B. I. (1997, March 10). Top schools. U.S. News & World Report, 122(9), 98-99.

Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lee, O. (1998). Current conceptions of science achievement and implications for assessment and equity in large education systems (Research Monograph No. 9). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Leitzel, J. R. C. (Ed.). (1991). Call for change: Recommendations for the mathematical preparation of teachers of mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Levin, J., Waugh, M., Brown, D., & Clift, R. (1994). Teaching teleapprenticeships: A new organizational framework for improving teacher education using electronic networks. Journal of Machine-Mediated Learning, 4, 149-161.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P., Love, N., & Stiles, K. (1997). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Marzke, M. (1997, March). Education: Curricula are getting a makeover as the market for teachers expands. U.S. News & World Report, 122(9), 96-97.

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America’s Future. New York: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Education Commission on Time and Learning. (1994). Prisoners of time. Washington, DC: Author.

National Science Board. (1996). Science & engineering indicators 1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.

Porter, A. C. (1991). Creating a system of school process indicators. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 13-29.

Porter, A. C. (1998). The effects of upgrading policies on high school mathematics and science. In D. Ravitch (Ed.), Brookings papers on education policy (pp. 123-172). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Raizen, S. A., & Britton, E. D. (1991). Building on existing systems (Department of Education Contract No. 43-3J47-1-00681). Washington, DC: National Center for Improving Science Education.

Ridgway, J. (1998). The modeling of systems and macro-systemic change—Lessons for evaluation from epidemiology and ecology (Research Monograph No. 9). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Rodriguez, A. J. (1997). Counting the runners who don’t have shoes: Trends in student achievement in science by socioeconomic status and gender within ethnic groups (Research Monograph No. 3). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Rodriguez, A. J. (1998). Equity and systemic science and mathematics education reform in Puerto Rico: What can we learn from the mouse that roars? Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Schlager, M. S., & Shank, P. K. (1997). TAPPED IN: A new on-line teacher community concept for the next generation of Internet technology. In Proceedings of CSCL ’97, The Second International Conference of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning, Toronto.

Smith, M. S., & O’Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing: Politics of Education Association yearbook, 1990 (pp. 233-267). London: Taylor & Francis.

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1998). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis (Research Monograph No. 11). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Stake, R. E. (1993). Teacher preparation archives: Case studies of NSF-funded middle school science and mathematics teacher preparation projects. Urbana: University of Illinois, College of Education.

Suter, L. (1996). Indicators of science and mathematics education 1995. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Tate, W. (1997). Race, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update (Research Monograph No. 2). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Treisman, U. (1997). What have we learned? What do we need to know? In W. H. Clune et al., Research on systemic reform: What have we learned? What do we need to know? (Workshop Report No. 4, Vol. 2, pp. 16-21). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Webb, N. W. (1997a.). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (Research Monograph No. 6). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Webb, N. L. (1997b). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (NISE Brief Vol. 1, No. 2). Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

Wenger, E. (1990). Toward a theory of cultural transparency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Zucker, A. A., & Shields, P. M. (with Adelman, N., Carver, R., Corcoran, T.B., Goldstein, D., Goertz, M., Humphrey, D., Laguarda, K. G., Marder, C., Matson, B., Schneider, S., & Wilson, C.). (1997, February). SSI strategies for reform: Preliminary findings from the evaluation of NSF's SSI program (Paper prepared for National Science Foundation). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.