|
|
ABOUT WCER
NEWS
Events
Cover Stories
Research News
International Research
Press
WHAT'S THE RESEARCH ON...?
PROJECTS
All Active Projects
All Completed Projects
PUBLICATIONS
LECTURE SERIES
PEOPLE
Staff Directory
Project Leaders
ERG - EVALUATION RESOURCES GROUP
RESOURCES
Conference Rooms
Equipment
GRANT SERVICES
GRADUATE TRAINING
SERVICE UNITS
Director's Office
Business Office
Technical Services
Printing & Mail
EMPLOYMENT
CONTACT INFO
MyWCER
WORKSPACE LOGIN
|
|
 |
|
|
Home >
What's The Research On...?
|
|
 |
|
What's The Research On...?
> Student Thinking | | Learning geometry through design When math teachers know more about students' thinking about space and geometry, students learn more, and this advantage is maintained over time. Teaching children equations Teaching math involves uncovering and correcting information children bring with them; some develop concepts about the 'equals' sign earler than was supposed Classroom Discourse and Teacher Change Students’ original contributions are important to productive classroom discourse. But teachers need to monitor where the discourse is going, and should develop some criteria for deciding when the class has reached the goal. Teachers need to learn the ‘stepping in and out’ that’s so important to promoting productive discourse. Mathematical talk is a skill unto itself that deserves instructional attention, according to UW-Madison education professors Mitchell Nathan and Eric Knuth.
CGI Math Encourages Ingenuity and Reasoning Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI) is based on research that shows that children come to school with rich informal systems of mathematical knowledge and problem-solving strategies that can serve as a basis for learning mathematics with understanding. A major goal of CGI is to help teachers build on this informal mathematical knowledge so that they understand the new ideas that they are learning. Because this method of teaching is innovative, CGI offers classroom teachers help in understanding how children’s mathematical ideas develop. The focus is on children’s thinking, not on specifying specific teaching procedures or curriculum materials. Adolescent Reasoning in Mathematical and Non-mathematical Domains Why do children appear so capable when reasoning in non-mathematical contexts, yet seemingly appear much less capable when reasoning in mathematical domains?
UW-Madison education professors Eric Knuth, Charles Kalish, Amy Ellis, and colleagues explored that paradox. Their research bridges the research on adolescents’ reasoning capabilities within mathematics education and within cognitive science. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|