skip to navigation skip to content
WCER - Wisconsin Center for Education Research Skip Navigation accessibility
 
School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

ABOUT WCER NEWS Events Cover Stories Research News International Research Press WHAT'S THE RESEARCH ON...? PROJECTS All Active Projects All Completed Projects PUBLICATIONS LECTURE SERIES PEOPLE Staff Directory Project Leaders ERG - EVALUATION RESOURCES GROUP RESOURCES Conference Rooms Equipment GRANT SERVICES GRADUATE TRAINING SERVICE UNITS Director's Office Business Office Technical Services Printing & Mail EMPLOYMENT CONTACT INFO MyWCER WORKSPACE LOGIN

   
Home > News > Cover Stories >
Scaling Up Innovative Practices in Math and Science
Scaling Up Innovative Practices in Math and Science
Tom Carpenter
Tom Carpenter

June 2004

Recommendations for reforming math and science education in the U.S. call for fundamental changes in the math and science content taught in schools and in the approaches to teaching that content.

For 8 years, researchers at WCER's National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science (NCISLA) worked with teachers and schools to create and study classrooms in which compelling new visions of mathematics and science are becoming the norm.

To support teacher change and enable these visions to "travel" to other classrooms, NCISLA researchers sought to understand how the transformed classrooms function, what it takes to create them, and how this knowledge can be used to launch similar classrooms in new settings.

NCISLA Director Thomas Carpenter and colleagues* found that fundamental reforms in mathematics and science learning and teaching are most likely to be achieved through professional development grounded in teacher inquiry and student conceptual understanding. How successfully an innovation travels across diverse conditions and geographical areas depends on the extent to which a teachers' professional community is established.

From 1995 to 2003, NCISLA conducted an integrated program of research that connected (a) the development of students' understanding of core mathematics and science content and practices, (b) classroom instruction and assessment that supports learning with understanding, (c) professional development that fosters teaching for understanding, and (d) the organizational capacity required to support professional development and the emerging instructional practices.

Since 2000, NCISLA has focused on how to use this research to develop successful instructional practices in new settings.

Given the ambitious vision of learning and instruction that Carpenter and colleagues embrace, these efforts present challenges, yet hold promise for student and teacher growth.

This article focuses on NCISLA's findings about learning with understanding, which provide the foundation for all of the center's research.

Learning with understanding

The foundation for NCISLA's work with students and teachers was its conception of learning with understanding. Understanding is seen as continuous mental activity rather than as a static attribute of an individual's knowledge.

NCISLA research (citations below) found that mathematical and scientific understanding emerges from four related forms of mental activity:

  1. constructing relationships;
  2. extending and applying mathematical and scientific knowledge;
  3. justifying and explaining generalizations and procedures; and
  4. taking responsibility for making sense of mathematical and scientific knowledge.
This framework applies not only to NCISLA's analyses of children's thinking and learning, but also to its characterization of instruction and professional development programs that support learning with understanding.

Carpenter says a major goal of NCISLA's research and development efforts has been to help students and teachers develop a predisposition to understand - and the conviction that understanding is important to them. When this goal is met, teachers and students become reflective about the activities they engage in while learning or solving problems; they look for relationships among concepts that might give meaning to a new idea; they critically examine their existing knowledge as they look for and apply knowledge to develop new and more productive relationships; and they view learning as problem solving in which the goal is to extend their knowledge.

Understanding as a community activity

Learning with understanding generally has been thought of as a process involving the individual. Learning, however, often takes place in groups, and one of the benefits of thinking about understanding as a process rather than an attribute is that one is able to see how understanding can unfold within communities of learners as well as within individuals. The various communities studied by NCISLA were engaged in practices of generating knowledge. Conjectures were proposed, and members of a group worked together to refine and validate those conjectures. Artifacts adopted by the community became a basis for collective reflection and articulation of ideas.

More on this topic (part 2 of the article) will be posted on this site in coming months.

* Carpenter's colleagues include Maria Blanton (University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth), Paul Cobb (Vanderbilt University, Peabody College), Megan Loef Franke (University of California-Los Angeles), James Kaput (University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth), and Kay McLain (Vanderbilt University, Peabody College).

For more information:

Carpenter, T. P., Blanton, M. L., Cobb, P., Franke, M. L., Kaput, J., & McCain, K. (2004). Scaling up innovative practices in mathematics and science. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science. Retrieved May 26, 2004, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/publications/reports/NCISLAReport1.pdf

Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (1999). Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gamoran, A., Anderson, C., Quiroz, P., Secada, W., Williams, T., & Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support change. New York: Teachers College Press.

Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P., & Dremock, F. (in press). Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Powerful Practices in Mathematics and Science http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/research/powerful.html

National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievement in Mathematics and Science (NCISLA) http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/ncisla/