Relatively few studies have examined the classroom context of writing development, and even fewer have considered the relationship between general classroom discourse and writing. This study uses an ecological framework for studying the relation between classroom discourse and writing. The framework emphasizes the reciprocal roles of teachers and students and focuses on the types of questions teachers and students ask as indicators of classroom discourse. The framework is assessed with data on discourse and writing in 54 ninth-grade English classes and 48 ninth-grade social studies classes. Analyses show that student writing benefits from classroom talk, especially when teachers ask "authentic questions" (questions for which teachers are not looking for particular answers) and incorporate student responses into the questions they pose (known as "uptake"). Student writing is also enhanced by instructional coherence among reading, writing, and classroom talk. Students who are required to write more frequently exhibit better writing in English class but worse performance on writing in social studies, a finding that may be explained by the different
purposes of writing in the two subjects. Social studies teachers used writing mainly as a check on reading, whereas English teachers paid more attention to the writing process.

Leadership

Funding

Status