skip to navigation skip to content
WCER - Wisconsin Center for Education Research Skip Navigation accessibility
 
School of Education at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

ABOUT WCER NEWS Events Cover Stories Research News International Research Press WHAT'S THE RESEARCH ON...? PROJECTS All Active Projects All Completed Projects PUBLICATIONS LECTURE SERIES PEOPLE Staff Directory Project Leaders ERG - EVALUATION RESOURCES GROUP RESOURCES Conference Rooms Equipment GRANT SERVICES GNS Proposal Preparation GRADUATE TRAINING SERVICE UNITS Director's Office Business Office Technical Services Copy & Mail EMPLOYMENT CONTACT INFO STAFF LOGIN WORKSPACE LOGIN

   
Home > Publications > WCER Working Papers
WCER Working Paper No. 2010-5
WCER Working Paper No. 2010-05

WCER Working Paper No. 2010-5

Unpacking an Engineering Practicum: Building Engineers, One Participant Structure at a Time
Gina Navoa Svarovsky
April 2010, 23 p.

ABSTRACT:

In response to industry’s demands for better prepared engineering graduates, capstone design courses have been included in undergraduate engineering programs for over 3 decades. These practicum experiences, typically encountered during the final year or semester of the course sequence, provide valuable “real world” experiences for students by allowing them to engage in the engineering design process within an authentic context. While the success of these courses has been extensively studied, much less attention has been paid to investigating how specific components of the practicum affect the learning processes of the undergraduates. This paper presents an ethnographic study of an engineering practicum. The study followed a student design team consisting of four undergraduates as they worked with an actual client to design a biomedical device. The paper specifically examines how two activities—meeting regularly with a design advisor to discuss progress and maintaining a design notebook throughout the project—contributed to the students’ development of engineering skills, knowledge, and ways of thinking. Understanding how these activities facilitate student learning can influence the design of future capstone experiences as well as other, more general engineering learning contexts.

View FULL TEXT as PDF
View FULL TEXT as FlashPaper


Get Acrobat ReaderAcrobat Reader is required to read and print PDFs. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you can download it here for free.

FlashPaper documents open directly in your browser without having to download a reader.

Keywords: Engineering; Design; Reflection; Practicum